Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6) |
Author: SuisseBear 🐝🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 75959 
Subject: Re: NATO
Date: 03/01/26 2:20 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 11
If Iran attacks America, does that mean NATO is null and void if the Europeans don't defend America?

Hardly, says AI:

The Mandate of Article 1

This is the "good faith" clause of the treaty. It explicitly requires members to:

"...refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations."

If a member state violates Article 1 by launching an unprovoked strike, they have breached the treaty itself. It is logically and legally difficult to demand the benefits of a treaty (Article 5) while you are actively violating its core premise (Article 1).
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds