Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! ¤
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! ¤
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (60) |
Author: Boater   😊 😞
Number: of 48413 
Subject: Re: Colorado Gift
Date: 12/20/2023 6:41 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
"First, the evidence of specific intent is not necessary to prove that someone engaged in an insurrection in a civil proceeding."

civil proceeding without the subject being ...tried...is not present to face their accusers?
The issue had already been rejected by the US Senate, no facing ones accusers, to ability to rebut charges.....does this sound like the American way of Justice?
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (60) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds