Post #10478 by albaby1 on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (60)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 7

civil proceeding without the subject being ...tried...is not present to face their accusers?

Trump was a party-intervenor, and was a full participant in the trial.

The issue had already been rejected by the US Senate, no facing ones accusers, to ability to rebut charges.....does this sound like the American way of Justice?

Again, there is a difference between civil and criminal charges. You can be acquitted of a criminal charge and subsequently found civilly to have committed those actions (most famously, perhaps, in the case of O.J. Simpson).

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (60)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.