Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (11) |
Author: Lapsody   😊 😞
Number: of 41628 
Subject: Re: Charges filed against Trump and Vance
Date: 09/24/2024 8:52 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
But they continued, without regard for any harm it may have caused. I know banning speech requires a high bar. But disregarding potential physical harm to others probably gets pretty close to it. As the article said, it shows intent. (Is that enough to show mens rea?)

Good question. I think the high bar of political speech may knock it out. If someone is killed and it is directly tied to the speech, that may work, but otherwise it's stochastic, and I don't know how that works. My memory is fuzzy here. I'm not even sure of everything Truimp and Vance have said here.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (11) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds