Post #26672 by Lapsody on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (11)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 2

But they continued, without regard for any harm it may have caused. I know banning speech requires a high bar. But disregarding potential physical harm to others probably gets pretty close to it. As the article said, it shows intent. (Is that enough to show mens rea?)

Good question. I think the high bar of political speech may knock it out. If someone is killed and it is directly tied to the speech, that may work, but otherwise it's stochastic, and I don't know how that works. My memory is fuzzy here. I'm not even sure of everything Truimp and Vance have said here.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (11)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.