Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (11) |
Author: onepoorguy 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 41600 
Subject: Re: Charges filed against Trump and Vance
Date: 09/24/2024 8:28 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 10
Makes sense. Even when confronted with facts, they continue the lies. So they can't say "oh, I guess I was wrong". They should have said that when Springfield authorities (among others) said it was false. But they continued, without regard for any harm it may have caused. I know banning speech requires a high bar. But disregarding potential physical harm to others probably gets pretty close to it. As the article said, it shows intent. (Is that enough to show mens rea?)

Springfield has had to close its schools temporarily because of bomb threats, plus the multiple individuals receiving death threats.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (11) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds