Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |
Author: Steve203 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 75964 
Subject: Re: Because...FU
Date: 10/25/25 11:44 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3

The Trump administration said it would monitor elections in California and New Jersey, which Democrats called an attempt at voter suppression.

"Monitors" are not supposed to interfere with people voting. On the other hand "challengers" can challenge a voter's qualification to vote. Right now, only eight states have formal polling place challenger laws (Michigan is one of them) I can see a Congressionally passed law, or Trump decree, requiring challengers in every state, dressed up as "election security". Then the challengers sit at the polling place, and demand proof of citizenship from anyone who looks like they may not vote "their way".

Steve
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds