Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In March 2025, in the thread "Re: OT, out", Umm asked the members: "Do you think it is because America is made up of magical soil that makes businesses based in America magically profitable?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (29) |
Author: albaby1 ✶❂🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 86279 
Subject: Re: The Republican Party is Gone
Date: 07/17/24 3:37 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
Here's what his running mate, J.D. Vance, said before Trump announced he was running: “I think Trump is going to run again in 2024. I think that what Trump should do, if I was giving him one piece of advice: Fire every single midlevel bureaucrat, every civil servant in the administrative state, replace them with our people.’”

Exactly. That's exactly the point.

Project 2025 is useless and unnecessary for making this point. Heck, Trump already passed an executive order implementing the so-called "Schedule F" effort to try to do this in his last term. You don't need a Heritage book to make the point that he wants to do this. He says he wants to do this!

This is not a disputed point. It's not a secret. Trump's campaign has confirmed they want to do this:

nbcnews.com - Trump retribution agenda government workers schedule f

The only reason to try to tie Trump to Project 2025 is that Project 2025 includes a lot of crap that Trump isn't openly admitting and proclaiming he's going to do - stuff that Democrats would love to convince voters he's going to do anyway. Like cutting Social Security and Medicare, or implementing a federal abortion ban, or criminalizing pornography. Okay, maybe the Democrats aren't focusing on that last part.

But the usefulness of Project 2025 is an effort to tie Trump to policies that used to be part of mainstream GOP platforms, but that Trump isn't openly and proudly embracing. If they can pull it off, it lets them run their greatest hits from past campaigns.

I don't think they can pull it off.

I think that Democrats are trying to ignore the fact that Trump's takeover of the GOP represents a real political realignment of the major parties, akin to what happened on racial matters in the 1960's and what happened on economic and regulatory policies with the Reagan Revolution. Prior to the 1960's realignment, Republicans and Democrats weren't sorted on racial matters (southern Democrats were among the most virulent supporters of segregationist measures); prior to the Reagan Revolution, there were still plenty of Republicans in favor of governmental spending and regulation in a lot of contexts (Republicans were instrumental in passing the Clean Water Act and Clean Air Acts).

If you went to the voters and tried to pitch Republicans as the party of minority rights in 1978 because the party of Lincoln used to be in that position, it would fail - the Civil Rights Act led to a radical realignment of the parties on those lines, and voters very much knew that the brand had changed. If you tried to pitch Republicans as a party that supported business regulation in 1982, simply because Republicans overwhelmingly voted for the Clean Air and Clean Water Act measures a decade earlier, you would have been laughed out of the room - Reagan had changed the party.

The same thing is happening here. Trump has effected a radical realignment of the GOP away from the Bush, Romney/Ryan, and (dare I say it) Reagan form of conservatism. It is now fully a right-wing populist party, rejecting the old Reagan-Thatcherite free market attitudes towards free trade, industrial policy, and government entitlement programs. Those days are gone, and pointing to Project 2025 as a way to pretend that they're not is going to be a fruitless effort.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 86,214 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (29) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community