Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (5) |
Author: onepoorguy 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 48434 
Subject: Re: TX Supremes: Carry that Dead Baby
Date: 12/14/2023 4:03 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 5
What cherry picking? She was challenging the TX law in front of the TX supreme court. They ended up ruling that she had to carry a terminally ill fetus to term. So if she couldn't afford to go out of state, she would have to endanger herself to deliver a fetus that is going to die very quickly.

I'm aware of the SCOTUS decision. It was flat wrong. Just like Dredd-Scot was wrong. Just like women's suffrage shouldn't have been left up to the states. Some things are just fundamental rights, or should be. SCOTUS sometimes gets it wrong, as I'm sure history will record the abortion decision to be wrong at some point in the future.**



**Perhaps not the "right to privacy" angle, which Roe was originally argued, but bodily autonomy (which I think would be the same amendment, just argued differently).
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (5) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds