Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (9) |
Author: Steve203 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 75964 
Subject: Re: birth-right citizenship
Date: 01/17/26 4:28 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3

SCOTUS would be going against more than a century of unanimous agreement that the 14th says you are a citizen if you were born here.

Precedent means nothing to this court. Of course, that is not unprecedented. "Separate but equal" was declared legal, until it wasn't. We really don't know what the court decides, until it decides. Whatever it decides, the losing side with litigate it again. As I tried to explain to Tim, on the Fool, years ago, in Shinyland, there is no such thing as "settled law".

Steve
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (9) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds