Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In March 2025, in the thread "Re: OT, out", Umm asked the members: "Do you think it is because America is made up of magical soil that makes businesses based in America magically profitable?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6) |
Author: tedthedog ⎊  😊 😞
Number: of 86253 
Subject: responding to a post on BRK board
Date: 03/19/25 9:48 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
I think it's worth an attempt to keep the BRK board about BRK and some OT topics concerning finance but try to actively avoid politics, because it's something that really punches people's buttons these days.

@tedthedog
Discussion of politics, including the war in Ukraine, are probably too much of a 'hot button' to discuss here and hope to retain the collegiality of this board.
@Lear
Maybe, but the increasing sympathy for, or neutrality with respect to, Russian aggression in certain U.S. circles is part of why I'm slowly doing what Jim has done quickly.

I'm Canadian, and the newfound U.S. stance on Russia-Ukraine/EU relations puts an important gloss on U.S. threats to treat the U.S.-Canada border as less than sacrosanct. Violating Canadian / non-U.S. citizens' rights in property or contract is hardly a massive reach when Trump can't go a day without describing Canada as the 51st state. And these aren't isolated incidents either.


I sympathize, and as an American I apologize. IMO, what's going on the U.S. is insanity.

Did people voting for Trump vote for him to bring prices down (that's impossible, he could bring inflation i.e. the rise in price down), or for him to invade Canada and take Greenland and Panama by force?
I don't recall e.g. invasion of our closest ally as a discussion topic or a talking point, pre-election.

Trump voters might have voted to reduce the federal bureaucracy. But did any but the most hardcore want it suddenly destroyed with a chain saw by the richest man in the world? And the attendant consequences, including massive conflicts of interest of this richest man? I don't recall Musk and chainsaw as a serious discussion topic or a talking point pre-election. Musk was certainly in view, and this raised questions about the advisability of the world's richest man donating $250M (or whatever it was) to elect the political candidate of his choice. After which he started hanging about in the White House and other federal offices. Vote Trump, get Musk?

I'm honestly not being snarky, I just don't understand these points.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to tedthedog here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 86,214 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community