Post #55798 by Steve203 on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (9)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 2

The big splash with little effect. But I do wonder what the "grooming" standards will be. :) So Hegseth is a groomer, eh?

Given that, at least since the invasion of Iraq, over 20 years ago, the GIs I have seen are clean shaven, with a distinctly "high and tight" haircut, I wonder how much more severe the "grooming" could be? I have pix of my dad when he was in the army, during WWII. He had a perfectly normal looking haircut, for the early 40s. That was the army that took down the Third Reich, so the haircut had nothing to do with the "war fighting" capability of the army.

It could be vanity on the SecDef's part: requiring flag officers to have the same sort of Christian Nationalist tats that the SecDef has, but that would be a pretty big, inflammatory, ask.

Steve

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (9)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.