Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In March 2025, in the thread "Re: OT, out", Umm asked the members: "Do you think it is because America is made up of magical soil that makes businesses based in America magically profitable?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (24) |
Author: albaby1 ✶❂🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 86289 
Subject: Re: Schumer to reintroduce border bill
Date: 05/20/24 3:34 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 11
The current statutes are giving him a political headache, and so to thread the needle between an angry public that's telling him This Situation Sucks and his desire for more illegal aliens we have these insane, performative compromises.

It's not an inane, performative compromise. The "situation sucks" because we don't have the resources budgeted to handle it, or the rules in place to shut things down when the situation gets out of hand. We would have gotten both of those things had the bill passed. It's not the performatively draconian bill the GOP wants, but it would have materially reduced the problem.

This doesn't carry the heft that you think it does.
democrats are openly saying, "We're the party that lets illegals on it and fentanyl flood in over the border". When you say they'll never negotiate on tighter border security...you're not landing the point you think you're landing.


They'll negotiate on tighter border security - but they'll never agree to a bill that doesn't have something for the DREAMERs now that this very unusual political moment has passed.

They certainly have the harder lift, educating voters that the GOP would rather keep the status quo and have a broken system rather than actually pass a bill. The dirty little secret is that the brutal employer and farmworker enforcement provisions that are in the House Bill wouldn't have gotten enough GOP votes in the Senate - the only reason that it passed the House is that the members knew it would never get enacted. The GOP also enjoys posturing on the issue. That's the point of this exercise - to demonstrate that the majority of Democrats would vote for a border security bill, and the GOP won't.

It will certainly be a political weak point for the Democrats....but that doesn't change the fact that the Democrats did offer border hawks the best deal they've ever been offered on the border. And they said "no." Had Trump not intervened, I think the two parties would have gotten to a bill that would have gotten significant GOP support....but that opportunity is lost, now.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 86,214 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (24) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community