Post #58322 by onepoorguy on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (20)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 2

...only a minority of the potential participants actually voted for her God and Savior, therefore, his regime is not legitimate.

Actually, tangentially, I would love a system where you have to have a run-off if someone doesn't get at least 50%+1. As you say, getting less than 50% -while legitimate in our system-, still sort of isn't legitimate (in a non-legal sense).

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (20)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.