Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In March 2025, in the thread "Re: OT, out", Umm asked the members: "Do you think it is because America is made up of magical soil that makes businesses based in America magically profitable?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (120) |
Author: albaby1 ✶❂🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 86289 
Subject: Re: Now That's a BAD Jobs Report
Date: 08/26/25 10:37 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
It is telling that the former above groups are generally not invited to immigrate to the Jewish state.

What are you talking about? More than half of the population of Israel is Sephardic. There was a massive influx of those folks in the years after the 1948 war, as the other Arab states in the region purged their Jewish populations (some of which had been living their since the Babylonian exile, not just the Roman one). Since then, those Jews have been more than welcome to emigrate to Israel.

Problems did not start between Palestinians and Jews until proto-Israeli Zionists started showing up there in the late 1800's.

Which they had every right to do. Those folks were legally immigrating to the region, with the support and endorsement of Abdul Hamid II. It's not surprising that some people who live in an area get very upset when people who are different than them are allowed to start emigrating there - just look at our experience with that here in the U.S. - but that doesn't make it wrong.

Regardless the beliefs or motivations of the settlers, it is a settler colonial project with the usual disregard and disdain for native inhabitants.

Except, of course, that the "settlers" are themselves indigenous to the area. Which makes this more of a "one land, two peoples" situation, regardless of the beliefs or motivations of the group that wants to claim that the other isn't indigenous.

This would be a much easier situation if it was a typical settler colonial project. If the Jews weren't indigenous to the region, if the increase of emigration of Jews to the area in the 1890s had been at the behest of a European colonial power rather than under Muslim rule. But we are indigenous, Zionism started with ordinary - and explicitly welcomed - immigration back in the 1800's, and partition (two state solution) would have been the just and appropriate response to that situation. As was originally proposed here, and as was successfully (though inarguably traumatically) implemented in India. The world would be a much better place if the original Partition plan had been allowed to go into effect, but sadly that was not to be....
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 86,214 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (120) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community