Post #9457 by albaby1 on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (82)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 7

It is fraud because they knew what they wanted and devised a biased scheme for it.

How is their scheme biased? They wanted to test Twitter's claim that major brands' ads wouldn't be placed next to toxic content. They set up an account that would show a lot of toxic content, and then checked to see whether any major brand ads showed up. Twitter placed major brand ads next to the toxic content - despite public assurances that those brands were protected against such placement.

However, X has the exact data about what ads were shown when and the facts are different than what Media Matters reported.
Media Matters lied !

How are the facts different from what Media Matters reported? What were their lies?

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (82)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.