Post #23326 by Lapsody on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (91)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 7

Because Biden would not enforce it but it would present an obstacle to Trump.

Ahh, I see. Biden would not spend the money to hire the admin staff needed to man the admin hearings on whether the asylees qualified for asylum even though he asked for and pushed for this legislation. Biden would not hire the extra border guards, etc., even though he's mandated too by Congress and would literally sink his chances of the next Presidency. *AND* he would do that because Mike is going to use his "feelings" about what Biden would do because he's got nothing else. Nothing. Mike offers his feelings.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (91)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.