Post #22575 by sano on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 6

“‘Look, if you’re a miserable cat lady, you should not force your misery on the rest of the country,’

The context: ""These children are the future of this country and yet the parents who have them actually have no advantage in our democratic process," Vance said. "They have a smaller voice in some ways — in very many cases — than the people who don't have any children at all. The children who come from these families have no real representative in our democracy. Why don't we change that?"

In that case, the list of those who should have less representation would include all the celibate religionists, gay/lesbian people who don't procreate, husbands and wives who could not conceive, parents whose children were killed in school shootings, people who simply choose not to have kids, ... and undoubtedly many more.

Why no simply deny them all rights and be done with them.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.