Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In March 2025, in the thread "Re: OT, out", Umm asked the members: "Do you think it is because America is made up of magical soil that makes businesses based in America magically profitable?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (140) |
Author: Dope1 ⎊  😊 😞
Number: of 86256 
Subject: Re: Canada is seeking new friends
Date: 09/16/26 12:50 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
They showed the UK is consistently regarded as having one of the most powerful militaries in the world.

So?

They're also considered to have one of the most powerful navies in the world as well:

By who? Did you even open your own link? They rank below the global powerhouse Indonesian Navy.

Which kind of counters your assertion that they have let their national defense capabilities fall to non-existent

The numbers back my assertion. You're posting from some random ranking site and stamping your foot.

There is no information that you've provided that refute the fact that Germany, France, the UK, and the other major non-US members of NATO contribute enormous resources and capabilities to their own defense. You don't respond to those, other than to handwave them away as being "OrangeManBad" or whatever.

I used your data and assertions and proved that friggin' Poland has almost as much stuff as the three countries you assert are just totally awesome *combined*.

The Brits have 2 aircraft carriers. One is laid up in the yard. The other can't be deployed because they don't have the ability to provide escorts.

One of us has a serious confirmation bias. Hint: it's not me.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Dope1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 86,214 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (140) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community