Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In March 2025, in the thread "Re: OT, out", Umm asked the members: "Do you think it is because America is made up of magical soil that makes businesses based in America magically profitable?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (34) |
Author: ptheland ✭✹🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 86289 
Subject: Re: Frank Luntz- on tonights Biden interview,
Date: 07/05/24 1:58 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
I’m glad you’re not concerned,

I'm incredibly concerned. As I just posted, this election isn't about the candidates. It's about the people behind the candidates. The Heritage Foundation is organized and ready to run the country as a white nationalist, "Christian" fundamentalist hell hole. You don't really think Trump can actually govern, do you? All the Heritage Foundation has to do is feed his massive ego and he'll let them do whatever they want. And I don't think you or I or anyone who isn't white and straight and the right kind of Christian want to live in their vision of the future.

Dukakis led by 17 points and one question at a debate started him on the path to lose the election.

Dukakis had an awful lot more going against him than one debate question. He was running against the sitting VP of a very popular President, for one big hurdle. Other suggestions I've heard are a poorly organized campaign and a publicity photo he took in an Abrams tank.

Perhaps thinking about that campaign from the other side is important. Bush Sr. was DOWN by 17 points at about this time of year and came back from that deficit to win decisively. I think he ended up with close to 60% of the popular vote and around 400 electoral college votes. So look at that campaign and see what you can do right to overcome the current deficit instead of focusing on the single shortcoming of your candidate. Especially when the opposing candidate has at least half a dozen major issues you can attack - including the same shortcoming your candidate has.

--Peter


Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to ptheland here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 86,214 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (34) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community