Post #41800 by albaby1 on the US Policy board

Pause to imagine what posts would you want to read here from others. It will likely be kinder, or involve original research with data, or be detailed and thorough, or all of the above. In response, aim to write your own posts in such a way. This will systemically produce the most valuable boards.

- Manlobbi

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (112)

Prev | Next

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 11

Yes it did. It allowed 5,000 or whatever the number was encounters a day before the President's "Shutdown authority" kicked in. In other words it tried to codify into law a restriction on the President's power to secure the nation.

How was that a restriction?

The President today has no "shutdown authority." The bill would have created a new "shutdown authority" that kicked in at 5,000 encounters a day. That's not codifying a restriction - it's expanding the President's authority to secure the nation.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (112)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.