Post #20568 by commonone on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (22)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 17

albaby1: The majority opinion explicitly states that there is no immunity for unofficial acts.

C'mon now. Simple plan for a simple populace: "We had information that indicated to us that the democratic candidate for president had top secret information he was in the process of handing over to China for their assistance in rigging the election in his favor. Immediate action was required to safeguard the security of United States and during his armed resistance, he died after an exchange of gun fire."

Official act, complete immunity, testimony or private records of the President or his advisers probing such conduct may not be admitted as evidence at trial, pardons all around.

Impeachment you say? Impeachment no longer exists.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (22)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.