Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In March 2025, in the thread "Re: OT, out", Umm asked the members: "Do you think it is because America is made up of magical soil that makes businesses based in America magically profitable?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (133) |
Author: albaby1 ✶❂🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 86258 
Subject: Re: The Affordability Tour Kicks Off
Date: 12/17/25 12:07 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 5
What is the real problem(s)?

The real problem is the triad I mentioned above. To be politically palatable, a conversion to single-payer has to:

1) Give nearly everyone access to above-average health care coverage (or else the people whose coverage gets worse will be pissed); and
2) Keep provider compensation more or less at current levels (or else the millions and millions of workers in the health care industry will be pissed); but
3) Not make people pay more for health care in taxes or premiums than they do already (or else they will be pissed that they're paying more).

That's the problem that has to be solved in order to make the switch. It's not a problem with the current system (of which there are many) or a problem with single-payer (of which there are still some). It's the barrier to making the transition. There actually isn't a way to deliver all three things. But because you have to break one of those three things, it's politically impossible to get it done.

It's more satisfying to blame some group of unpopular entities (insurance companies or 'big pharma' or whomever). But the reality is that if you want to reduce the amount we pay for health care, you have to reduce the amount we pay for health care - and we don't spend enough on "wasteful" things to do it just by cutting waste.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 86,214 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (133) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community