Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (36) |
Author: Steve203 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 75960 
Subject: Re: Why NOT Greenland
Date: 01/11/26 10:54 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
Most here realize that, if Trump did take Greenland by force, the rest of NATO could not respond militarily?

First, the European navies don't have the capability of projecting force across the Atlantic.

Even if Europe could strike across an ocean, they would need to pull most of their land and air forces out of Europe, leaving it open to invasion by Russia.

So, God given human form Trump, sees an undefended island he can easily grab. Talking heads have observed that developing the resources in Greenland would take decades. But they miss the obvious: Trump can make himself a fortune, now, selling mining concessions.

Steve
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (36) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds