Post #42136 by EchotaBaaa on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 0

The worst part is: Trump could've gone the other way on this one, and crushed it politically.

A majority of people - want it preserved as is.

A majority of people - are open to tax hikes for this to happen.

What is FICA cutoff - 176k? If Trump would've gone out and said - no more cap. FICA continues from $176K on. And we'll bump the age a year. And if that's not enough, tweak again.

Done deal.

A majority of Trump's voters benefit, and a majority of the new taxes are paid by the blue folk.

Instead the Republicans want to use Social Security to give power to Democrats.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.