Post #28237 by onepoorguy on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (15)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 0

I've seen some speculation that as soon as the convict is sworn-in, they'll invoke the 25th Amendment. Which is plausible, and would probably work. The convict genuinely is incapable and unable to perform the duties.

The question is whether Dems would go along with it (at least some would likely have to). Vance is a nightmare in terms of policy, but I don't think he is incompetent. And he certainly doesn't have dementia. It could be argued that the convict needed to be removed for the good of the country, even if someone like Vance then steps in.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (15)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.