Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In March 2025, in the thread "Re: OT, out", Umm asked the members: "Do you think it is because America is made up of magical soil that makes businesses based in America magically profitable?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (9) |
Author: marco100   😊 😞
Number: of 86270 
Subject: Re: The Files
Date: 11/18/25 7:23 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
Steve, I'll tell you exactly what is going on:

1. The attorney(s) for these women want the files disclosed to identify potential lawsuit targets. Even if what's in there is total innuendo and hearsay, that doesn't matter. It might be enough to conjure up a civil conspiracy lawsuit against a bunch of wealthy people. Maybe even a civil RICO type lawsuit. They don't need to actually win a trial, they just need to be able to file a lawsuit that survives an initial motion to dismiss and get into the discovery phase. Then even if the targets didn't do anything really actionable the case may have a lot of settlement value just due to the further bad publicity exposure. Look what just happened to Larry Summers and he wasn't even sued. He just asked Epstein for dating advice and he's totally cancelled now.

2. The politicians who are in favor of this want the same as they think they can make political hay out of it in some way. They all had to vote in favor except the one principled lone dissenter Clay Harris, because they're politicians and they don't want to stand up to a tidal wave. It's easier than doing the right thing which would have been to vote against this ridiculous travesty of justice.

3. The key to understanding this strategy is recognizing that Congress can't be sued for defamation nor can the DOJ if acting pursuant to statute in releasing the records. They have absolute immunity in this situation.

4. The second key is to also understand that when you file a lawsuit you have judicial privilege or immunity for anything in your lawsuit which might be defamatory. So that closes the circle.

5. As long as the victims or their attorneys or the politicians don't make any defamatory public statements they have not committed defamation, yet they can use anything in the files to prop up their lawsuit.

6. Please note how none of the victims who have spoken at these recent press conferences have named any names or given any details about their abuse. They have all been well coached by their attorneys not to do so, as it might expose them to defamation lawsuits.

Now that I have explained it to you, you can put your various conspiracy theories to rest. The real conspiracy is the one I've just outlined for you.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to marco100 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 86,214 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (9) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community