Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (124) |
Author: Dope1   😊 😞
Number: of 75967 
Subject: Re: STOP ENGAGING WITH FASCISTS
Date: 01/29/26 6:41 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
Again, it is only under your value system that this behavior is "bad behavior."

Sure. If someone wants to have a values system where they believe that incarcerating criminals is wrong, they're welcome to that.

So WRT sanctuary systems, supporters believe it is better to let ___ illegal aliens who have criminal records avoid easy detention by ICE than to have _____ otherwise law-abiding illegal aliens end up getting their lives upended, for whatever values of those blanks.

Which, again, basically ignores the entirety of immigration laws we have in this country. The framework conveniently skips over that.

If the left wants amnesty, let the left come out and argue for amnesty. But it can't hide behind this you know, some of those illegals are ""innocent"" because they, regardless of your position on them, are in a sticky place in the law as it is written today.

So for the framework, you have to start with a definition of "guilty" vs. "innocent". Because *all* illegals are on the wrong side of the law (as written today).
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (124) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds