Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (75) |
Author: Dope1   😊 😞
Number: of 48450 
Subject: Re: <i>But I don't think the Dems have the
Date: 02/19/2024 2:32 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
And I know you keep harping on "locking in" numbers.

I harp on it...because it was in the bill. Notably, not a one of you was willing to budge on ANY of the numbers.

Right now, the "locked-in" number is a lemniscate (i.e. infinity). The entirety of the human population could cross the border, and we can do nothing about it. "Locking in" a number less than that probably was a good idea.

This isn't true. You guys are hiding behind al and his legal explanations like some kind of Magical Protection Shield from an online video game. We're not held hostage by any international law or treaty. Fact.

At any time Biden could do a number of things that he won't do. Such as: build more wall. Stop suing Texas everytime Abbott erects a barrier. Stop paroling asylees into the country. Or even better, announce that the United States has a right to control its borders and will do that regardless of whatever treaty says the entire world is allowed to waltz in.

That you guys are disputing that last point tells me a lot.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (75) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds