Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (43) |
Author: Lambo 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 80406 
Subject: Re: Trump Iran Deal vs Obama Deal
Date: 05/25/26 12:37 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1


Except that it didn't. You only need a few percentage points of enrichment to make uranium go boom. Every additional point just means the weapon gets smaller.

Obama's deal left them with fairly highly enriched uranium. Ergo, the deal sucked. For that and many other reasons.


Yes it did. The lowest boom so far has been 80%, and it's only theoretical that you can go lower. Going lower causes huge problems, vastly more explosives, and the ability to focus is easily lost, making a uranium dust explosion highly likely - not an atomic explosion.

What you're saying is that if Trump makes a modified JCPOA, it's brilliant, but if anyone else does the same thing, it's the most horrible agreement ever made.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (43) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds