Post #60395 by Lapsody on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (42)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 6

Most likely that the separation of powers prohibits a judge from administering a benefits or entitlements program.

It seems more likely that the separation of powers doesn't normally allow the Executive to usurp powers delegated to Congress as the Executive has unfaithfully done in this case, and Kanji's stay hopefully means appeals will rule by Monday, expediting the case. If the original court was following the law, that's not a judge administering benefits, that's the judge following the law and recognizing people will be irreparably harmed.

I'd ask you, do you really want children not to be fed and go hungry? Is that your aim? Do you realize your "winning" in this case means people and kids go hungry and are more miserable. Is that what you desire?

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (42)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.