Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6) |
Author: AlphaWolf 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 77758 
Subject: Re: Oregon has to trim 800,000 from voter rolls
Date: 04/30/26 3:23 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 21
So Oregon has to follow the federal law. Good.

Other states mentioned included Colorado and Kentucky (Kentucky had almost as many inactive accounts as Oregon).

Voter rolls including inactive accounts (people who have died, moved, etc.) should be cleaned up.

I read the whole article. It was all about removing inactive accounts.

If the accounts were inactive, then obviously there wasn’t any fraudulent voting involved. Makes the SAFE act look like complete bullshit.

But sure, the rolls should be cleaned up. Makes sense to me.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds