Post #20850 by ptheland on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (9)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 14

It wasn’t necessarily an endorsement of Labour; more like a rejection of the Tories who had been governing like the Liberals.

Why wouldn't they go for one of the parties further to the right? They could have gone to the Reform party instead of the Labour. If the Tories were governing like liberals and the people weren't happy with that, why pick the liberal Labour instead? Seems like that would be a move from a party acting like liberals to the actual liberals. And that makes no sense.

Seems more like a full on rejection of Conservative policies, particularly Brexit, which isn't working out at all like the Conservatives said it would.

--Peter

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (9)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.