Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search BRK.A
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search BRK.A


Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (22) |
Author: albaby1 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 19824 
Subject: Re: Trump corners SCOTUS
Date: 11/06/25 6:55 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 9
Do you know if there is any legislative history which might shed some light on what Congress intended?

Oh, yes - there's a ton of legislative history. It was extensively discussed in briefings and the oral arguments. This was a whole thing back in the day, when Richard Nixon used the predecessor statute - the Trading With the Enemy Act (TWEA) - to similarly impose tariffs under a claim of national emergency (but really because we were having balance of payments problems). That was hugely controversial, and Congress went back and completely rewrote the TWEA in response to Nixon's actions in order to curtail the scope of powers that Presidents could assert in emergency situations.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Emerge...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trading_with_the_Ene...

So there was a lot of debate, both in the lower courts and in the SCOTUS proceedings, over whether the cabining of Presidential authority that Congress engaged in when replacing TWEA with IEEPA had the effect of restricting the scope of the "regulate" power, which Nixon had asserted.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (22) |


Announcements
Berkshire Hathaway FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds