Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In March 2025, in the thread "Re: OT, out", Umm asked the members: "Do you think it is because America is made up of magical soil that makes businesses based in America magically profitable?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (14) |
Author: Steve203 ⎊❂🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 86269 
Subject: Re: My moves in France
Date: 07/19/26 9:20 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 5

I’d hazard a guess that France doesn’t have as much a problem with wealth disparity as we do in the US.

from the net sifter:

The US has a significantly higher Gini coefficient than France, indicating greater income inequality. Recent World Bank data shows the US with a Gini index of 41.8, whereas France measures 31.8

United States (41.8): The US features one of the highest levels of income inequality among developed, high-income nations. This is driven by high concentrations of wealth and wages at the top end of the spectrum and a relatively larger population of lower-income earners compared to Europe

France (31.8): France exhibits a much more egalitarian distribution of income. This lower score is primarily a result of the country's robust welfare state, including extensive progressive taxation, social security benefits, and public services that actively redistribute wealth


Of course, to the "supply side" advocates, the US' high Gini coefficient is a feature, not a bug. The claim is that concentrating wealth in the hands of the few is necessary for "capital formation", from which all the goodies will flow. As Mark Russell explained it "that means, if David Rockefeller prospers, that prosperity will trickle down, down, down, all the way to Jay Rockefeller."

Steve
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Steve203 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 86,214 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (14) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community