Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (118) |
Author: Dope1   😊 😞
Number: of 48449 
Subject: Re: war with Denmark or Panama??
Date: 01/09/2025 3:21 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
And Poland.

The Poles don't need to be told about the Russians and what they're like, so they've always been a NATO member that spends what it should.

NATO is also a global force; it doesn't just align itself against the Russians.

Subs are important counter-naval assets, but they're not going to provide a huge amount of direct support for a European invasion.

Subs are for sea lane denial. Why do you suppose we have hydrophone arrays along the ocean floor in the G-I-UK gap?
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (118) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds