Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In March 2025, in the thread "Re: OT, out", Umm asked the members: "Do you think it is because America is made up of magical soil that makes businesses based in America magically profitable?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (13) |
Author: marco100   😊 😞
Number: of 86281 
Subject: Re: Agents of CAHOS
Date: 01/13/26 9:41 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
This is simply not a big deal at all, assuming Powell is "clean."

Even Powell himself, for reasons unknown, hasn't said there is no basis for the DOJ investigation.

Which is very, very strange.

What Powell actually said/implied was that this was a purely political attack on the independence of the Fed.

The Fed is and remains accountable for how it spends the public's money, just like any other Federal agency.

It would have been nice if Powell had acknowledge that obligation.

It would have been nice if Powell had come right out and point blank said that the construction project that the Fed is being investigated for is faultless and the investigation will give the Fed and Powell a completely clean bill of health.

Let's agree Trump sucks.

"Trump sucks" is not a defense for Powell or the Fed if it turns out they didn't manage this project correctly.

I'm assuming that Powell himself doesn't actually manage this stuff, someone from the GSA probably does, but apparently as Fed Chair, he has overall responsibility for it.

Evidently there was a $700 million cost overrun on the project. That's not itself alarming, I imagine these kinds of projects frequently have cost overruns just like when you renovate your kitchen and it ends up costing 3x the initial estimate.

It would have been nice if Powell had addressed this in his whiny little speech the other day.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to marco100 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 86,214 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (13) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community