Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (120) |
Author: commonone 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 48466 
Subject: Re: Another Day Another Shooting...
Date: 04/13/2023 10:16 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 14
Dope1: Case 2: Another man who stole hundreds of documents belonging to the United States -- some classified at the highest levels -- refused to return them, ignored a subpoena, had his attorney falsely claim all the documents had been returned, moved the documents between locations, left them unsecured, and decades later Joe Biden still has not been arrested or indicted.

Fixed that for you.


Congratulations, not a single word you wrote is correct (well, other than that Biden has not been arrested or indicted).

Biden did not steal hundreds of documents. The Justice Department took possession of six items and some of Biden's handwritten notes from his vice-presidential years to further review them. There's no way to know how many documents date to his Senate days (although Congress has now been briefed on the Biden, Trump, and Pence documents).

Funny, you conveniently neglected to include Pence.

Biden immediately arranged to have the documents that were discovered returned by his attorneys.

He was never subpoenaed.

His attorneys never made false claims on his behalf.

Documents were not moved.

The documents were locked away (although an argument could be made that they were not technically secured, at least not the ones in his locked garage).

You need to investigate the legal definition of intent and then apply that definition to the actions of Trump, Biden, Clinton and Pence.

As Comey explained as he was destroying her candidacy, they could not find the required 'intent' to indict Clinton.

And as the Trump administration clearly demonstrated, several individuals in his administration used private email to conduct official government business, including Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner, and daughter Ivanka Trump, both advisers to the president, former deputy national security adviser K.T. McFarland and former adviser Stephen K. Bannon, adviser Stephen Miller, former chief of staff Reince Priebus and former National Economic Council director Gary Cohn.

None of them will be indicted, either.

Again, the required 'intent' necessary to indict would be difficult to establish.

The fact that a cult still believes Trump is the second coming of Christ and are willing to overlook his criminal behavior makes me sad for this country.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (120) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds