Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In March 2025, in the thread "Re: OT, out", Umm asked the members: "Do you think it is because America is made up of magical soil that makes businesses based in America magically profitable?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (64) |
Author: albaby1 ✶❂🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 86289 
Subject: Re: About Iran’s Navy “At the Bottom of the Sea”
Date: 04/28/26 4:36 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 10
This very thread!

Did someone say that the U.S. tried to open the straits and failed? In this thread or any other? I must have missed that. Could you point me to it? My position, and I think it's the same as those of other folks, is that the U.S. hasn't tried to open the strait because it would be enormously difficult to do so - in exactly the same way that we haven't tried to overthrow the regime through a ground forces invasion. We could do it, with a combination of naval, air, and ground forces occupying the various islands and coastal areas surrounding the strait. But it would be immensely costly in terms of lives and resources, so we're not willing to do it. For the same reason we're not willing to launch a ground invasion.

The strait's been closed for > a month now. Why isn't oil at $400 a barrel right now?

TACO, of course. :)

The market has been optimistic that the supply interruption will be short, and that the temporary shortfall caused by a modest closure of the strait would be accommodated once it re-opened. Ameliorated by draws on the strategic reserves that were announced early in the conflict. That's why the spot price for oil has been so much higher than the futures price. Dated Brent for immediate delivery is trading closer to $140-150.

I put the smiley on there because it's not truly "TACO," in the sense that markets thought Trump would necessarily turn tail and run. Rather, Trump has continually assured markets that the conflict will be brief, that he felt our war aims had already been achieved, and that Iran was on the verge of giving us everything we want. Right? He has been constantly assuring the markets that the war would be 4-6 weeks, that we were on schedule, that this wasn't going to be a long drawn-out conflict. So I think markets have generally assumed that there was some bundle of things that Iran was already willing to concede that Trump was pretty close to deeming acceptable, and that therefore any shortages would remain in the short term and only affect spot prices. That's also while U.S. oil drillers haven't been expanding capacity - they, too, have been expecting that the conflict would not drag out. But if we really are settling in for a long blockade, you can expect prices to really start climbing.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 86,214 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (64) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community