Post #28421 by wzambon on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 7

Emphasis on the “could be”, because so far the story doesn’t seem to have reached major news outlets…

“Could be” because more nailing down of sources needs to be done.

“Could be” that nothing surprises anymore when the subject is Donald Trump.

Regardless, the subject is a surveillance op run against Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff and a number of other Democrats, apparently with the knowledge and approval of Donald J. Trump while president… at least according to one whistleblower:
https://open.substack.com/pub/grantstern/p/did-tru...

Would this be covered under “official duties?

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.