Post #76736 by wzambon on the US Policy board

When visiting Shrewd'm with a laptop, it can be pleasant to hold Command (or Ctrl with Windows) and '+' a few times. The site scales to allow any font size, and the larger font can be pleasant to read even for Shrewds with perfect sight! For luxury Shrewdness, you can combine that with setting the browser to full screen. You'll then find yourself Shrewding a lot.

- Manlobbi

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (12)

Prev | Next

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 0

The result would be 4350 House members. Yeah, it's a lot, but it would much more fairly represent the population fairly.

Unfortunately, looking at the matter from the perspective of how deliberative bodies work…… you’d end up with a ponderous mob, not anything resembling a group of men and women who could weigh and intelligently decide complex issues.

Still, it would be better than the smaller gaggle of gridlocked mad babies we have now.

But I think you’re right to be considering alternatives.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (12)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.