Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6) |
Author: Goofyhoofy 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 77758 
Subject: Re: Oregon has to trim 800,000 from voter rolls
Date: 04/30/26 4:14 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 17
If the accounts were inactive, then obviously there wasn’t any fraudulent voting involved. Makes the SAFE act look like complete bullshit.

Yes, these are inactive accounts, which by definition means they have not voted in (at least) the past two elections.

Inactive account holder are ineligible to receive a ballot, either by mail or by in-person voting without going through the registration process again.

I’m happy that inactiuve accounts are being cleaned up, and also that it means that not a single one of them has voted inappropriately since being declared “inactive.”

Around 160,000 people leave Oregon each year by moving out of state, and around 40,000 die, sol roughly 200,000 per year are “inactive” because they’re not there. Another large cohort simply doesn’t vote very often, and so they become inactive by dint of not showing up.

Again: NO ILLEGAL VOTING NOTED.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds