Post #11489 by Dope1 on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (203)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 1

If you hire enough judges to get that time frame down to a more reasonable six months or so, then you've reduced the number of people that would need to be housed by 90%, or roughly have a year's worth of asylee applicants. A vastly smaller number. And even if you don't detain 100% of them, the number of asylees who are not detained while awaiting their hearing will be a much more manageable number as well, and won't crush the communities they live in while awaiting their hearings.

Hire 1 million asylum judges and process the cases instantaneously at the border.

The bureaucracy isn't the problem. It's the fact that more people are coming that we as a country can absorb. What's your plan to address that?

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (203)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.