Post #3111 by sano on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (11)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 1

They would be clean (both from disease, and from whatever they use to "cut" the drugs, if what I see on TV is even remotely close to reality**), doses could be monitored, and it cuts the legs off of the cartels/criminals if the government is basically giving it away.

I felt that instead of trying to demolish the Afghanistan poppy crops to deny the talibs revenue, we should have bought the entire crop. That way the talibs would be denied revenue and we could use the product to maintain our junkies as well as the junkies in all NATO nations, eliminating a large % of street drug traffic. . That would also deal a severe financial blow to the coke, fentanyl and meth cartels.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (11)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.