Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In March 2025, in the thread "Re: OT, out", Umm asked the members: "Do you think it is because America is made up of magical soil that makes businesses based in America magically profitable?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (55) |
Author: albaby1 ✶❂🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 86269 
Subject: Re: Why didn't judge Merchan impose a fine?
Date: 01/10/25 2:47 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
And why didn't Merchan just put the case on hold until Jan 20, 2029 when Trump becomes a private citizen again?

I imagine it's because that's utterly unprecedented. It might specifically violate some provision of the NY criminal rules of procedure, which probably don't contemplate a four year delay between verdict and sentencing. But even if it doesn't, that's something that probably has never happened before.

Criminal defendants are entitled to due process - and while that's in some ways a pretty vague and nebulous term, it generally encompasses the right to have a criminal case processed under normal and regular rules. It would be highly unusual for a judge to delay sentencing for four years, and especially to do so for the purpose of being able to have more power to impose a harsher sentence than would be lawful at the moment (to phrase it in a way Trump's lawyers might). That might pose a defect that prevents sentencing at all.

I'd also heard that postponing the case would allow Trump's lawyers to have 4 years to come up with a way to get the case thrown out, but they're going to be doing that anyway, aren't they?

Not really. There are a few legal disabilities that come with being a convicted felon that don't inhere to someone who had their case thrown out, even if no additional penalty is imposed after the verdict. And there are obviously a lot of non-legal, reputational consequences that come from being a felon than someone who was never convicted.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 86,214 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (55) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community