Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (22) |
Author: PinotPete 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 75959 
Subject: Re: Trump corners SCOTUS
Date: 11/06/25 3:47 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 5
Congress knows how to talk about tariffs, and they have adopted lots of statutes that deal with tariffs - if they wanted IEEPA to include tariff authority, would they have "hidden" that by using the word regulation and not say the word tariff?

Yes! This is exactly what I got from the oral arguments. No matter what questions were thrown out to each side and no matter what answers were given, the argument always seemed to come back to this. Congress has never had trouble including the word tax or tariff in a statute before when that is what it meant and, in IEEPA, it did not use either word.

Pete
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (22) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds