Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (11) |
Author: marco100   😊 😞
Number: of 75974 
Subject: Re: 427-1, 100-0. Heh.
Date: 11/18/25 7:11 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
Dope 1,

since you posted the house and senate votes on this fiasco, let's highlight the lone dissenter, Clay Harris R-La.

The ONLY principled voter of the lot. He voted against it because it contradicts 250 years of procedure and principle of protecting the confidentiality of innocent witnesses, victims, informants, and so forth.

I don't know anything about Clay Harris but I like someone who stands up for what is right, especially when he is all alone.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (11) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds