Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |
Author: commonone 🐝🐝 BRONZE
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 75974 
Subject: Trumpedo EPA: Soot and Ozone...
Date: 01/12/26 7:02 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 10
...may not be bad for you. And that from now on, the E.P.A. would no longer take health effects into account in the cost-benefit analyses necessary for clean-air regulations. Instead, the agency would estimate only the costs to businesses of complying with the rules.

Previously, the E.P.A. calculated that for every $1 spent on reducing PM2.5 (particles less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter, small enough to penetrate deep into the lungs and enter the bloodstream), there could be as much as $77 in health benefits.

It’s a seismic shift that runs counter to the E.P.A.’s mission statement, which says the agency’s core responsibility is to protect human health and the environment, environmental law experts said.

The change could make it easier to repeal limits on these pollutants from coal-burning power plants, oil refineries, steel mills and other industrial facilities across the country, the emails and documents show. That would most likely lower costs for companies while resulting in dirtier air.


https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/12/climate/trump-e...

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds