Post #1130 by Umm on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (25)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 3

"Indeed. I wanted to see if you'd moved on from your 3 go-to tactics

1. Change the subject and don't address the thread (Check)
2. Make out of context or false, sweeping generalizations in support of #1 (Check(
3. Never, ever stake out a position on anything (Check)"

That is intellectually dishonest of you. Why do you act so insulting to others by being dishonest with them?

He literally provided numerous links to show where your assertions were factually wrong. He literally addressed each of your points specifically. It is intellectually dishonest to say otherwise.

Here is a question for you to bring it back on topic. You falsely asserted that no one was trying to get Toni Morrison novels banned, you have been shown evidence to the contrary. Do you still believe your assertion is true? Can you acknowledge your opponent's point?

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (25)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.