Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |
Author: Steve203 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 75964 
Subject: Re: Gerrymnader Wars
Date: 10/13/25 10:39 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
This would be redundant. iirc, a few years ago, the court held that, while racial gerrymanders are illegal, political gerrymanders are perfectly fine. Since MAGA wants to eliminate all political opposition, the green light for political gerrymanders is far more useful than racial gerrymanders.

From the Google net sifter:

In a landmark 2019 decision, the US Supreme Court ruled that federal courts have no authority to hear challenges to partisan gerrymandering. The ruling, in Rucho v. Common Cause, effectively prohibits federal courts from striking down maps drawn to give an unfair advantage to one political party.

Steve
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds