Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (43) |
Author: marco100   😊 😞
Number: of 75968 
Subject: Re: Jack Smith Deposition Released
Date: 01/01/26 8:28 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
Commonone,

You are obviously a complete jackass.

Do you not realize that Jack Smith used his deposition to filibuster against Trump as an advocate--not as a neutral, objective witness?

You do not believe in the rule of law.

You do not believe in democracy.

If all that was needed to sustain a conviction under American jurisdprudence was the deposition (hearsay!) of a highly biased prosecutor with a long history of overrreach, including being overturned in the Supreme Court 9-0 on at least one occasion (a HUGE accomplishment!), then we could dispense with judges, juries, witnesses, defense attoreys, evidence, and trials.

Just as you would prefer.

FASCIST.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (43) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds